Smite Agni Build Guide: Agni Make It Rain....PAIN!

MFN

God Build Guides for Smite Play

MFN

Join or Log In

To Top

Join the leading SMITE community.
Create and share God Guides and Builds.

Account Login

Create an MFN Account

Social Login

Social Register

MOBAFire WildRiftFire CounterStats DOTAFire HeroesFire VaingloryFire RuneterraFire FarmFriends ForzaFire LostArkFire

Create Guides
- Create a New Guide
Guides & Builds
Gods & Database
Community
- Forums
- Blogs
- IRONMAN
- God Concepts
- Videos
- Streams
- Social Channels
  - Discord
  - Twitter
  - Facebook

Not Updated For Current Season

This guide has not yet been updated for the current season. Please keep this in mind while reading. You can see the most recently updated guides on the browse guides page

Vote Vote

by updated

Smite God: Agni

Choose a Build: Still a solid build for Season 7 mid

Still a solid build for Season 7 mid Conquest Sustain

Tap Mouse over an item or ability icon for detailed info

Agni Build

Notes Sell boots for Spear late game

Mage's Blessing

Book of Thoth

Shoes of the Magi

Chronos' Pendant

Bancroft's Talon

Spear of Desolation

Rod of Tahuti

Spear of the Magus

My Opinion On Agni After rank X.

Not Going to go into great detail or anything. I love Agni I think he is one of the more under-utilized gods in smite. I play him 2 ways depending on if I'm playing conquest or any other game mode. I feel a pro Agni will never let you see his noxious fumes coming. He would instantly ignite after his 2 or with his 3 as an escape. This is the way Agni was meant to be played. Except when playing conquest. Noxious fumes is always my first pick and I use it to clear waves, as with magi's blessing you get the 25 damage. When you hit full build your ult will deal out close to 2700 hundred damage alone each hitting for roughly 900. Once you get the hang of insta-igniting your fumes your well on your way to Agni Domination.

Conquest

In conquest I play a little different I find this build trades burst damage for sustain and cc. With Gem you really slow enemies down with your passive and 3 after igniting them. Making your Ult more accurate and deadly. The Increased life steal and health make you very spongy of damage. You could trade out typhoons fang for book of the dead for the health shield if your taking more damage than you can recover from. Also Shamans ring is a great substitute for fang if your dominating and want to be even more trolly it combos nicely with gem on lowering protections and movement speed as well as increasing yours by 10%.

You need to log in before commenting.

Collapse All Comments

Hmm...thats troll's build and starter
Fumes up first ??? Pls if ure a 10 agni player u cant say that ! Buy some logic and retry smite...

(143) |

“Noxious fumes is always my first pick and I use it to clear waves” - Allright so you just admitted you’re a troll

(394) |

No, they didn't say that; that comment is unnecessary. Maybe they feel that extremely safe clear is preferred. It's got a lower CD than the other two abilities, and placed properly can hit the entire wave.

That said, Phantom, you do realize that is typically the starting ability, and it clears MUCH better than Fumes, right? As long as you're not going to be poked constantly, you should generally be able to avoid the enemy's waveclear ability at level 1, then go to the archers and dash through them back to your side.

What other reasons do you have for getting Fumes at level 1?

(143) |

Did you really just suggest noxious fumes is a viable level 1 choice? Yikes

Yes let’s wait 10s for my waveclear ability to do damage close to an instant 2 or 3, and let the enemy melee minions kill my melee minions for free and walk out of noxious fumes at level 1. Absolutely terrific.

If “safety” is the argument you can start the 2 (which can apply his passive, Which also procs mage’s blessing). Starting the 3 at level 1 is generally the best option. Also if you feel you won’t be punished for it, you don’t have to walk to enemy archers and use the 3, you can also do it from the minions to the archers and then walk to the side / your side (probably not ideal into someone like Thoth due to the CD reduction on his 1 if hits consistent shots).

Load more comments (1 more replies) →

(394) |

I love (I honestly DON'T love) how you put words into my mouth. No, I just gave some possible reasons this person thought it might be better to level Noxious Fumes first.

THEN, I spent time explaining the BETTER option, and how to use it safely. I did it in a manner that acknowledged the person's choice without being harsh, and then offered an alternative that I would suggest. This is basic decency and an appropriate and effective way to get people to listen and consider a different approach.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/evolution-the-self/200906/criticism-vs-feedback-which-one-wins-hands-down-part-2

Your passive aggressive comments need to be adjusted. There are ways to educate and suggest without being sarcastic, biting, and toxic, and for all the comments and responses you get in this vein, I'm sure you understand how you sound to others, I just don't understand why you refuse to make an effort with this.

(46) |

Well, Bran didn't say noxious fumes is viable at level 1. He's trying to figure out why OP levels the 1, and he's trying to convince the OP that the 3 is the better choice.

(143) |

There is no point in trying to understand a decision that was made without any logic. And this is on top of the build being bad itself.

(46) |

When a build/skill leveling is bad, Bran usually tries to understand why the person builds a certain way so he can educate and convince them that their reasoning isn't optimal.

But you pretty much hit the nail on the head
"Yes let’s wait 10s for my waveckear ability to do damage close to an instant 2 or 3, and let the enemy melee minions kill my melee minions for free and walk out of noxious fumes at level 1."

I think there's a more polite way of saying it though. This guide isn't low effort troll nor is it a one and done. The OP is actually taking the time to respond to feedback.