Smitefire logo

Join the leading SMITE community.
Create and share God Guides and Builds.

Create an MFN Account






Or

Dissecting Smite #1: Oversexualization, Stereotyping, Double-Standards, and Other Misogyny in Smite

Please review our General Rules & Guidelines before posting or commenting anywhere on SmiteFire.

Thread Locked

This thread has been locked by the moderators, you cannot reply to it.

Forum » General Discussion » Dissecting Smite #1: Oversexualization, Stereotyping, Double-Standards, and Other Misogyny in Smite 305 posts - page 11 of 31
Permalink | Quote | +Rep by All4Games » December 20, 2014 10:09am | Report
when in that pm have i insulted you fromt he point on ward in which i said that i will not make accusations and would be less aggressive in my posts.

since that, not at all. so that is a false statement.
never forget dawngate and never forgive EA. Freia will hunt them for eternity.

All4Games


Distinguished (54)
Posts: 2513
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | +Rep by Zanestorm » December 20, 2014 11:57am | Report
Warning: This is a long post.

TL;DR - You cannot prove that video games cause real-world sexism. There's nothing wrong with sex or sexualisation. Women are allowed to be sexy if they wish, and are allowed to represent themselves as they choose. Hi-rez is allowed to represent women and men as they choose, as long as it fits the lore in some way. This is not an issue at all. There is a difference between reality and video games. There is a difference between women and Goddesses.

I come back to this. I almost fell off my chair, 10/10 sub you do entertain. Lets get to business.

To preface this I'm a genuine Eclectic Pagan, so I know one hell of a lot more than most people about Ancient Gods and Goddesses. I'm also an undergraduate History student that studies Modern and Ancient History, as well as some Archaeology topics [specifically Religion and Ritual.]

The main premise of your argument is that Smite does not treat women well. As you don't mention men in this, one can assume that you implicitly believe the women are specifically being represented worse then men comparatively. Linked to this, you must naturally believe there is some real-world implication to how this game represents women in terms of equality, as that is a one of the arguments you use. There is a strongly underlying ideological bias in what you've said, as it's pretty clear you're a Feminist of some description.

We'll come back to this later. I'll break down my rebuke as you've presented your argument:

Subzero008 wrote:
Over Sexualisation

"oversexualization of women is bad because its part of the whole double standard that women face in...everything, really. You know, sort of like how James Bond can sleep with dozens of women and be described as be "cool" or "suave" or "a ladies man," while a woman who casually sleeps with more than one person is a "****." Or how women are expected to look sexy to attract customers, while men can look badass and cool and other ****. This is discriminatory, or unfair, which is BAD. Seriously, I can't believe I have to explain this ****."


Over-sexualisation happens to both men and women in the real world and in video games. This is a fact. Is either a part of a broader social issue? No. Video games are their own culture, in which it is most often explicitly made clear that X video game does not represent reality in any way, even when parallels are drawn. Reality is obviously different by it's nature, so basing your argument that video games are bad from irrelevant real-world examples was a poor place to start. Focusing these examples only on women was also misguided, as it's demonstrably true that men also face double standards in many regards, as well as legal discrimination in the Western world. [But that isn't relevant here, it's just a by-product of the irrelevance of your own argument in this section.]

There has not been a single statistically valid study that has linked video games to any real-world changes in worldview or perceptions. Just as video games do not make us violent, they do not make us sexist. They do not affect our reality at all, beyond our own time. Unless you have Academic evidence to the contrary, which I can bluntly tell you does not exist, then you cannot implicitly conclude that if X game is sexist, it will perpetuate or lead to sexism in reality. You have no basis for this implicit conclusion.

Subzero008 wrote:
What is Over Sexualisation?


Your argument here is that Smite over sexualises it's Goddesses comparative to other games in the same genre. The difference is that Smite draws its inspiration from the real world. You'd clearly be surprised to realize the sheer volume of deities that have been represented in a sexual manner, even when not linked to sex at all. Indeed, most Ancient beliefs held that the deities could take whichever form they wished, so artistically they could be presented as whatever the artist felt the deity represented, which is subjective in nature.

Moreover, sexualisation itself is subjective in nature. TMI: I'm gay, so I don't find any of the female Goddesses to be sexual in nature at all. But beyond that, you're assuming that all straight males have the exact same preferences and will find each Goddess sexy, which simply isn't true at all. Sexuality and preference is far more diverse than you're presenting it, which is a shame as I'd expect more for someone claiming to support equality.

What "some women" want is irrelevant. Female deities are not "some women," that is incredibly disrespectful. I actually reeled when I realized that you are comparing all-powerful female deities to modern human women. what even. Like either you have an incredibly low expectation of deities or a ridiculously high expectation for modern women. Either way, that is the most ridiculous thing I've read this month. Grats. Female deities are female [this is debatable - Theological debates over whether deities are human or even gendered, or simply represent themselves / we represent them that way] that is literally the only link between modern women and female deities. They aren't to be interchanged - they are entirely separate. To steal tumblr speak - #triggered yo.

Subzero008 wrote:
'If every single goddess wants to look like a bedroom roleplaying scenario, not great.'


FML. These are video game characters sub, not conscious women. The female deities themselves have not made that choice. But if they had, who the hell are you to put a quota on how many women would be allowed to do X, just because it doesn't fit your narrative? Let alone dictating how female GODDESSES should represent themselves. Sounds like your arguing to take agency away, rather than give it.

Subzero008 wrote:
'Meanwhile, 90% of goddesses dress like they want to look sexy. The only ones to not do that aren't legal, or are drastic outliers. While the men are wearing actual armor and stuff, the women are wearing literal ribbons and thongs.' & "The lore" section


Most, if not all Goddesses have been represented in a sexual way at some point by somebody. Equally, many people don't view the Goddesses as sexual. I'm referring to both IRL and in Smite. People are more than sex objects. Even when they present themselves in a sexual manner, not everyone will see it that way or even care. Also, There's plenty of male characters that - when the lore fits - are dressed in a more sexy way - like Apollo, which you mentioned, Hercules, Chaac ect. It's simply the case that lore and artistic representations of females from the Pantheons Hi-rez have drawn from can be done in a sexy way, because traditionally many Goddesses were represented in that way.

I would actually LOVE to see more sexualised males [all of the ****!] One of my favourite characters is Apollo for that reason. Equally I'd love to see more elegant or well-dressed females, which is one of the reasons Chang'e is another of my mains. But I would NOT love for Hi-rez to break from lore just to cave to thought police. I hate the fact that more males AREN'T sexualised in Smite, because by rights they absolutely should be. Why should they reduce sexualisation - when as you point out many deities have been represented as naked? Should it not then be that Hi-rez should simply be adding more sexualised male Gods to balance things out?

But linked to this, exactly what is wrong with male or females being presented as sexy? Want to know a fact? You're alive because of sex. Want to know another? Pretty much everybody on earth is alive because of sex. That's alot of sex. Sex isn't wrong or demonic, it's entirely natural. So to is sexualisation, as humans are a sexual species. Representing males OR females as sexual is not inherently evil, or part of some evil plot to weaken X gender.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Sex Sells"


That's a fact. Sex does indeed sell - look at the porn industry.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Here's a question: Does HiRez care about money more than treating women like actual ****ing human beings, or are they just misogynistic *******s?"


The Goddesses in Smite are pixels. They are not real women. Hi-rez is not treating women like anything, because there are no real women in Smite. Indeed by definition there never will be, because not only is this a game, it's a game about deities. Women aren't deities. They're human, like males. Misogyny has nothing to do with this, because real women are not involved or impacted in any way by the female representation of deities in a video game that they probably don't even know exist.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Gods are supposed to be beautiful"


Gods are the desirability of man kind. You're literally disillusional if you think most Gods AREN'T represented as beautiful, period. Beautiful is a desirable human trait. Deities frequently represent desirable human traits [there are exceptions.] Ergo many Deities naturally represent beauty. It's nothing to do with being shallow, it is an Archaeological and Religious observation based on the fact that the majority of deities are gorgeous.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Second, you can make someone look beautiful without sexualizing them, idiot. You can make someone look attractive without giving them giant breasts and putting them in a metal bra and thong."


Completely agree. Chang'e is beautiful, but she isn't sexualised. But what chang'e commonly represents isn't sexuality at all, she's a Goddess of dance. Elegance is her claim to fame, and Hi-rez did a fantastic job of getting that through in her model and abilities. But many female deities are BOTH beautiful and sexual, and there is an obvious link between the two [desirability.] Denying that is foolhardy and bluntly wrong.

Subzero008 wrote:
"You just want them to be ugly!"


I agree with you, that is a stupid argument. Although if a female deity is added to the game that in lore is ugly, I'd like her to be represented that way. A good example is dark Hel, actually. Variety is the spice of life, so I'd actually be quite happy if Hi-rez added heavier, uglier and more brutish female deities, it's simply a struggle to imagine where they'd find the source material for it.

Subzero008 wrote:
"It's just Fanservice, like any other Game!"

> "Smite goes so over the top with their misogyny"


Misogyny is 'Dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women' [Oxford dictionary]
You have presented no evidence that Hi-rez has a dislike of, contempt for, or prejudice against women. If anything, presenting the female form as attractive and desirable would suggest a love of women, not a hatred. Moreover - again - This is pixels, not real women. There is no link between video games and real-life sexism. Actually, there is also no real link between 21st Century Sexual Liberty and misogyny either.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Stereotyping"


Happens in every game, including smite, to both genders. You're foolish if you think the male deities aren't stereotyped and over-simplified too, because they absolutely are. Does Stereotyping suck? Yes. But it isn't appropriate to go into a long back story in the MOBA genre, so it's commonly done. Each deity has a memorable gimmick, one thing that makes them stand out and be remembered, because really thats all the flexibility a MOBA actually offers in terms of story-telling.

Also, women are allowed to enjoy cooking, baking, sewing, being feminine and all that jazz. Again, it isn't anyones place to tell women they're less valuable because they fit a stereotype, THAT is misogynistic. IRL women CHOOSE what they want to do, regardless of what you think about it. Of course, these pixels aren't women, but their gimmicks fit their real-world lore in some way, even if its played on as a joke.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Distribution"


You say women are over-sexualised, and then point out that there aren't enough women.

... Um?

Here's an idea. Maybe Hi-rez aren't sexists, and they literally don't care about the perceived gender of the deity. It's simply how the cards have fallen.

Subzero008 wrote:
Suitability


You pointed out further up that many deities fought and walked around nude.

They're deities. Do you think they care about suitability? By all accounts, hi-rez is incredibly generous in the clothing department on all deities across the board, as most of them were indeed naked, when fighting and otherwise.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Weapons and armor are treated as equally important, and together they let mortals fight off gods"


1) This is not common across all pantheons
2) This is not common across all cultures that these deities are taken from
3) Most of the time these weapons were created by the deities themselves, and so it was one of the only items that could be used to effectively slay a deity.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Second, if they don't need armor, they wouldn't ****ing wear the "armor" they have on, because armor is clunky and heavy."


They're deities. They don't care about how heavy something is, that is a mortal concern. If they can fight well nude, I'm fairly confident they can fight in anything.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Examples of Improvement"

"Equality is what it should be like. Just like how some men in Smite wear heavy armor, some won't, some don't care, and yes, some embrace their sexiness, the same can and should apply to women as well."


You literally just debunked your entire OP by pointing out that women should absolutely have the autonomy to represent themselves however they choose, equally so Hi-rez should have the autonomy to represent male and female deities however they choose.

Also, deities aren't relevant to equality. They also aren't human, so stop treating them like they are, just because they're represented as gendered.

Subzero008 wrote:
"I'm too lazy to find a picture I like for every single goddess."


I don't care about what you like. Your infringing on freedom of expression and artistic freedom because you take issue with sexy female deities. That's your problem.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Internalized Sexism"

"the biggest problem is in the little things." I think you'll find you just contradicted yourself. Large problems are more important than small niggles that aren't even problems. Welcome to the real world.

"The point is, we absorb harmful ideas and associations throughout our lives."


I knew this was coming. As all the way up in my intro, provide me an academic and verified study linking representations of people in video games to real-world thoughts. It doesn't exist. I can tell you that for a fact.

Subzero008 wrote:
"This leads to unpleasant things like rape culture."


Even the biggest anti-rape organisation in America - RAINN - has flatly destroyed the idea that rape culture exists. You want to talk about rape culture? Let's talk about the fact that if a man is raped by a woman in the Western World, that isn't considered Rape despite it accounting for about 40% of all rapes outside of prison. Let's talk about prison rape, which btw the majority of the victims are male. Also, what does a de-bunked by Academics and Anti-rape institutions alike Feminist theory on rape have to do with Smite, or video games for that matter?

Subzero008 wrote:
"Video games as a whole are guilty of this, and Smite isn't the biggest problem, but nor is it the smallest. This internalized sexism is why female gamers have problems like GamerGate, and why the industry is so hard to change."


There are plenty of females in GamerGate, and plenty of males for that matter too, as far as I know. But if you want to get into technicalities, gays are way, way less represented in video games, and are indeed presented poorly if at all. They also face significantly more real-world discrimination across the board. But that isn't because of video games. Nor is sexism caused by or made worse by video games.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Apathy and the Vicious Cycle"


This isn't about Apathy. This is about you making problems where they don't exist based on your own ideological viewpoints that come across as incredibly bigoted and unbalanced.

Subzero008 wrote:
"Conclusion"

"The game isn't harmless."


Prove it. Literally, prove it. You'd be the first person ever to prove a correlation between video-games and real-world problems. As I've already pointed out, you have no studies to prove this because they don't exist.

Subzero008 wrote:
"End"


Proof that deities exist. That was *****y. But I'd be lying if I said I was sorry. ;)

Zanestorm


Remarkable (9)
Posts: 166
Permalink | Quote | +Rep by _angrytoast » December 20, 2014 12:04pm | Report
Wow. I'm at a bit of a loss for words. Good piece. +1

_angrytoast


Memorable (14)
Posts: 204
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | +Rep by Subzero008 » December 20, 2014 12:49pm | Report

My main irk out of all the goddesses are Athena's jokes. She's supposed to be the badass virgin goddess of wisdom and war who sent Ares crying to his mommy during the Trojan War. What does Hi-Rez do with her concept? They make her the stereotype of a really oversexual woman by saying things like "this should cover my private parts!" and jokes like "I like to think my enemies are looking at my eyes, but we both know what they're really looking at." Uh Athena? May I reiterate the part where you decided to not undergo the temptation of sex and here you are making jokes about men looking at your breasts and talking about... armor for your genitalia...? What ._.

EDIT: I just realized she said vital parts not private, but still Athena, boob jokes? I thought you were supposed to be dignified D:

Dignity literally doesn't exist for goddesses.

_angrytoast wrote:



That would actually make sense, I mean the main art team for Hi-Rez are mostly women, why would they make goddesses look overtly sexual.

From where do you think that HiRez' design team is mostly women? And Smite has been making oversexualized goddesses for a long, long time.

HolyPudding wrote:

Snip

Just an FYI, the pics you put up look better than Smite's. And for the record, you did say that they ruined them a fair bit with those alt costumes.

And like I acknowledged in the What's the Point section, Smite isn't the worst, but nor is it the best. But it's still a problem.

_angrytoast wrote:

If you look at character design, many of the goddesses are impressively done, watch this video:


Here's what I don't get. This video is old, and I specifically answered the video in the thread, but again, you didn't read it and are just jumping on the H8 Sub Train.

The video's message is basically: "Kali was naked in lore, so it's fine for her to be scanty. Same for the other goddesses."

I ALREADY ADDRESSED THE LORE DEFENSE. Are you intentionally ignoring that part?

_angrytoast wrote:

I am going to say one last thing before I retire on this post.


@Subzero

I realize how much work you put into this site and I have the deepest respect for you; even when I ***** at you over debate topics such as this one.

@All4Games

I would rather argue with sub then deal with some of the **** you throw at people. Defend your original thoughts, don't be a follower all the time.

You're an unpleasant person and I hope you actually leave instead of passive-aggressively taking jabs at me.

Also, All4Games and my own opinion differ. He seems to think that realism has to do with real life and stuff; I say that realism is referring to the "in-universe" real. For example, magic is realistic in the Harry Potter universe.


Yeah Toast, idk why you always go into Sub's threads with such a negative mindset towards Sub and All4. You are literally the only one using insults here, and no, calling someone a sycophant is hardly an insult. To think it is would make someone really sensitive. I mean calling someone obsequious is less of an offense than calling someone stupid or a jerk.

You are suddenly pleasant. Thank you.

_angrytoast wrote:

Wow. I'm at a bit of a loss for words. Good piece. +1

Hypocritical, much?

Subzero008


Renowned (112)
Posts: 4262
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | +Rep by Chiulin » December 20, 2014 1:04pm | Report
Subzero008 wrote:


You don't find any fault with how women are mostly strippers while the men are balanced and diverse? That as you said, "women are treated as sex toys?"

I'm probably shoving words in your mouth, but I think that if you found it a problem, you'd have mentioned it. After all, you said that only the age inappropriateness is the "real issue."


I'm saying it isn't really an issue if it is labeled as a sexually explicit game. If it was, then that would be one of the goals. Unfortunately they don't do that. So I'm saying that I agree with you, because they don't label their game properly and try to deny the fact that it is way oversexualized.

Chiulin


Prominent (31)
Posts: 624
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | +Rep by Subzero008 » December 20, 2014 1:21pm | Report
_angrytoast wrote:

If you would like to divert the fact that Zanestorn just tore you argument apart by picking at me be my guest.

So arrogant. I'm replying to him as we speak.

How sad. You keep saying how you respect me and want to leave this argument, and you keep hanging on like an obsessed fanboy.

Subzero008


Renowned (112)
Posts: 4262
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | +Rep by _angrytoast » December 20, 2014 1:23pm | Report
Subzero008 wrote:
So arrogant. I'm replying to him as we speak.


How am I arrogant? Your the one who loses it with people who don't share your opinion!

_angrytoast


Memorable (14)
Posts: 204
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | +Rep by _angrytoast » December 20, 2014 1:31pm | Report
Subzero008 wrote:
How sad. You keep saying how you respect me and want to leave this argument, and you keep hanging on like an obsessed fanboy.


I am in no way a fanboy. I think your a loudmouth arrogant prick, who happens to contribute a lot and has a good writing style.

The respect I have for you is in no way built from your personality, which I find repulsive. It is only built from the skill you have in writing; even when in some cases is directed negatively at me.

You wanna know why I went into this post with a negative attitude? It is because this post is literally built to communicate how bad you think Smite is. If you're that butt-hurt about Dawngate being cancelled, then you seriously need to get your priorities straight.

Sorry if this too personal, but I had to say it.

_angrytoast


Memorable (14)
Posts: 204
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | +Rep by Zanestorm » December 20, 2014 1:32pm | Report
Subzero008 wrote:


So arrogant. I'm replying to him as we speak.

How sad. You keep saying how you respect me and want to leave this argument, and you keep hanging on like an obsessed fanboy.


Sub, I've heavily edited my post to make it more friendly and less aggressive. Just FYI, it has changed around abit.

Zanestorm


Remarkable (9)
Posts: 166
Permalink | Quote | +Rep by HolyPudding » December 20, 2014 1:53pm | Report
Subzero008 wrote:


So arrogant. I'm replying to him as we speak.

How sad. You keep saying how you respect me and want to leave this argument, and you keep hanging on like an obsessed fanboy.


Honestly, this has been building up for a while, but **** you. You straight up IGNORED the post that tore you apart so you could insult toast. Your method of arguing isn't to win with your points, it's to weaken other people. You attack others for questioning you on open discussion and simply disregard the idea of respect. Why should you demand any sort of civil response when you work off of insults and emotions rather than logic and reasoning. This post was, most certainly, made to villify smite. Why not make this an off topic thread about why you hate sexualisation? Why just Smite? This is getting personal but you asked for it. Your argument right now is consisting of picking on Toast, like a debate where you make no points and your entire speech is rebuttal. We get your opinion at this point, so defend it with reasoning and don;t hide behind a barrier of insults and anonymity. I'm probably getting banned for this, but I heavily dislike your way of discussion and quite frankly I don't care how many posts you've made you're acting like a prick. Where's the nice guy that made stuff like the insane jungling guide, that guy was awesome. All we get is an overly aggressive idiot who hangs out on a forum just to spread hatred. Sorry for being so blunt, I feel it had to be said.
"We are none but friends

All born to the same forum

Why not live in peace?"

HolyPudding


Established (19)
Posts: 556

SMITEFire is the place to find the perfect build guide to take your game to the next level. Learn how to play a new god, or fine tune your favorite SMITE gods’s build and strategy.

Copyright © 2019 SMITEFire | All Rights Reserved

} } } } }